Yes hi, hello! Let's chat about LoR stuff! My team is starting work on the January balance patch and I thought this would be a great opportunity for y'all to share your thoughts and opinions on what you'd love to see changed!
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Spot removal is so bad on this game. I'd really love to see the team giving more thought on removals and spells without being bound to units or archetypes. Just evergreen removal.
I'd argue that removals being a bit more costly/limited was one of the defining design choices that I enjoyed liked with LoR -- it feels like Nami and others are pushing for wanting more/better removals but is that the correct direction for the game?
-
-
The ratio of answers to threats is what really matters here. It's important for a player to feel comfortable playing units and that they can provide a reasonable amount of protection. It's also important for players to have tools to remove things when they really want to
-
So long answer is yes, in general I think that's the direction that is beneficial for the game today, and likely changes in the future. It's a gradient on how much power we want removal vs threats to be at any given time. could change in the future
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
When most of the treats are payoffs? I believe so. Not only this, but this would stretch the deck build/archetype options. Diversity is not only about number of decks viable, but also the amount of different deck types being competitive.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.