Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I haven't kept track. I've played a decent number but not for long, because wearing VR goggles with the glasses I need to see quickly gives me a headache and some games cause nausea, which is not an issue I have with texting, video chat, or non-VR video games.
As a game developer for 23 years that has worked on flat screen games and now done VR games for 6 years (Lone Echo 1 and Lone Echo 2), I will again say for a fact that presence (seeing your hands, being at a location) is greater than non-VR games. Immersion in VR is greater.
That's awesome and I think VR is perfectly fine for games! I'm not talking about games, though, Geoff's original post was talking about basic communication like Zuck was selling it for. I was a game designer for 6 years then switched careers to online education.
In that role I spent hundreds of hours or more (6-8 per day, 3-5 days per week) teaching, communicating, and emotionally connecting with tens of thousands of people around the world. I couldn't have done that with VR; emotional connection is far superior via real-face video.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
