As Biden keeps fading, I don't know at what point the DNC realizes it has to get behind Warren to keep Sanders from the nomination, but whatever point the DNC figures that out at will *probably* be too late. That's the DNC's history of short-sightedness.https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/22/politics/cnn-poll-sanders-biden-january-national/index.html …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
PS/ That's a piece of political analysis coupled with advocacy for Warren. But the analysis part—regarding the polling data, and the historical distrust of the DNC for Sanders—is not intended as a personal knock against *either* Biden *or* Sanders. Both of them are very good men.
67 vastausta 59 uudelleentwiittausta 459 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
PS2/ So for instance—returning to straight analysis here—Clinton had an opportunity to either attack Sanders and fire up his base/further divide the party *or* endorse Warren and stay silent on Sanders and so, in a generative way, work toward what she wants. She chose the former.
21 vastausta 62 uudelleentwiittausta 397 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
PS3/ Clinton chose the former because the DNC is still squarely behind Biden, and Clinton wants to be where the DNC is at so she can keep having at least *some* clout with the national party. The end result, ironically, was a *frustration* of her chief ambition: to stop Sanders.
27 vastausta 48 uudelleentwiittausta 366 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
It frustrates me so much that the DNC seems to be willing to repeat past mistakes all because they want to stay in power. They need to be better, give up some power and be willing to endorse Sanders. Clinton being a DNC pawn, ugh. If they keep it up they’ll lose again to Trump.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.