Except Neil Gorsuch was just appointed to the SC with no such allegations because, presumably, he wasn’t a total drunk dickhead to women for the first three decades of his life or so.
-
-
-
Or maybe Gorsuch was replacing a right-leaning judge, and not potentially tipping The Court into a new direction. Perhaps the Left didn't see Gorsuch as threat.
-
I’m quite confident that had Neil Gorsuch sexually assaulted women in his past, that would have become known in the confirmation process. You picked a shitty nominee Hoss.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! Every one of his accusers have been proven liars
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How dare he lecture us
-
Tweet unavailable
-
He blocked me. I demand justice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s not he said/she said when he is a proven liar (even under oath) and multiple trustworthy accusers have come forward, each with supporting documentation/testimonies/lie detector etc
-
No supporting documents or evidence, and lie detectors are garbage science.
-
Go pound sand, RU bot!
-
She blocked me
-
That's what they do. Isn't that supposed to be illegal or something though?
-
Only if you are president
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That what the left want to happen destroy the constitution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s the problem. They don’t want good & competent people. They want ideological hacks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It already has.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or as Democrats call it, win-win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.