Can’t image why Doesn’t know where it happened... Doesn’t know when it happened... Can’t recall how many people were there... Democrat activist... Hires Democrat activist attorney... Parents home was foreclosed on by Brett’s judge mother... No response to senate requests in 36hra
-
-
-
Oh.... I forgot that she also deleted all her social media. I don’t buy the, “I did it to protect my family.” No, you just did it to hide your hatred for conservatives and people you disagree with.
-
Otherwise known as... “Pulling a Hillary”
-
After HRC, it is difficult to believe anything that comes out of a Demo Rats
mouth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She doesn’t know. Of course she knows. If she had thought this claim of Ford’s were true she would have released it when she received it months ago. She knows her voters will follow any thing she says. They have to in order to keep the “goodies” coming. They have sold their souls
-
I think they overestimated Ford's ability to go before the committee and lie and they also thought they could delay everything and run out the clock. They were really counting on a long FBI investigation.
-
To get her to go on the record, Ford was promised she wouldn't have to testify. So here we are.
-
Redic!!!!! If you accuse you must prove!!!!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And yet Senator Feinstein was willing to ruin someones reputation and career over something she's not even sure is truthful.....
#Despicable -
If Ford is truthful, it is not she nor Feinstein responsible for "ruining" anyone's reputation or career. Actions have consequences. We don't know who is telling the truth and who is lying yet.
-
We do know that one party is not willing to speak under oath.
-
That's not true. Her attorney said she is more than willing to speak under oath. That doesn't mean the terms offered to her (public hearing, no FBI investigation for background, no other witnesses) are okay with her.
-
They offered both public and private under oath hearings. Fbi has already stated they will not investigate. When making an allegation of this kind in a circumstance of this magnitude, it is your duty to testify.
-
"Fbi has already stated they will not investigate." This is not true. That is what Trump said today, and it was a lie. Trump needs to direct them to reopen the investigation, they cannot do so on their own.
-
FBI has ZERO jurisdiction over this and cannot investigate! Stop watching BS television shows.
-
You're the one who is misinformed. This would not be a criminal investigation. The FBI does routine background investigations on SCOTUS nominees. They already concluded their one on Kavanaugh. In 1991 they re-opened the investigation on Thomas after Anita Hill came forward.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't know if it's true, but more importantly, DOESN'T CARE.
-
She knows it's not true...but did it anyway.
-
They ALL do. ALL their freakouts are fake. They know it. It's planned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.