Mike CernovichVerified account

Killing a baby in the first trimester is the same as killing a baby in the third. Yeah, the baby is closer to full term so it appears more odious, but morally, I don't see any difference other than size of development.

I am pro life for me and mine but ultimately I feel it’s up to individuals to choose for themselves but 3rd trimester abortion strikes me as evil and killing a human that could definitely survive out of the womb so only if it’s a life or death situation in the 3rd trimester

I wonder if minds would be changed if they sat through an abortion at 3,6,and 9 months....

I didn’t know this about Tulsi!

I actually watched the remainder of that interview. She’s definitely the best on the Democrat side running

So who decides when it becomes a baby? It is either a separate living entity, or it isn't. If it is, then it has the right to life, if it isn't, then the host can do whatever it wants whenever it wants. The answer for any christian should be simple, but nothing ever is today.

If it's so obvious, why did Mayor Pete respond "first breath" and Beto answer "up to the moment of birth." It's not like they are beholden to Planned Parenthood.

I wish I could take such a firm position on a single moment in an arbitrary timeline.

Most Democrats don’t support any of the Radical Left BS that every declared Candidate has dreamed up from past failed Communists and Dictators to try and prove that they are the most progressive candidate. Except Tulsi.