Step 1: Embrace censorship and cancelling as a tactic Step 2: ??? Step 3: Freedomhttps://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1170092051716694016 …
If player A attacks, player B launches an equal counter-attack. If Player A de-escalates, a truce may arise. This is basic game theory. Too much MUH WEED at Google-funded Reasoh? https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/1998-99/game-theory/axelrod.html …
-
-
Finally someone else who gets it.pic.twitter.com/WGcENr9Ooz
-
Yes. It's why everytime Conservatives actually DO something headlines say, "Conservatives pounce". They didn't 'pounce' they are just playing by the rules. Either adapt to the game or get defeated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Follows, "Treat people with your best when you first meet them, then treat them like they treat you." Ancestors advice now confirmed by software. Lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*chef’s kiss*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But in order to de-escalate, the left must admit that this is indeed their wallet. They never will. It'd throw too much dogma out the window.pic.twitter.com/r3EghHymoJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tweet of the day!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...they think we are evil." They don't want truce (bipartisan compromise) because we're all literally Hitler.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That only works if player A is rational and can think more than one step ahead. If player A is a hothead who can't think straight...
-
You could find almost all types of animals performing various tricks in circus. If you can teach a lion jump through a circle with the appropriate amount of kicking...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And then conservatives turn around an say I need open carry because I need to defend my self. Uh.. If you are against murder as a principle why don't you let the perp shoot and bleed to death. Why u need to shoot back???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. The Tit-for-Tat solution to iterated Prisoner's Dilemma problems. "Respond in kind (or with similar effect on them as theirs ha on you) to last action taken by counterparty"
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's called tit for tat and it or a variation of it has won tournaments since game theorists started playing in the 1980's
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Robby doesn’t need weed to completely miss the point. His power hungry narcissism takes care of that just fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
mike gets it. one of the reasons why I started respecting him in 2016. strategy wins. we just need to try to minimize the collateral damage on the way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You mean player B may deescalate. After the attack from player A. After pain is shared.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.