Books find you, or you find books, at exactly the time you need them. Better to read widely as life is dynamic, and the classics will find you.https://twitter.com/adamscrabble/status/1167799671533789192 …
-
-
Anyone learning a second language knows this is true. If you don't know the words to describe your inner state, you don't have an inner state.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So it’s like thinking fast and slow. 2 parts to our brain
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the object of our interest that is at the heart of what matters. : ) Money talks and BS walks in the world of emotions and thoughts. www updates dynamically in response to your previous interactions and guides you to the machine's directive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fascinating to realize that consciousness isn’t possible without language. Cons. like everything else evolved slowly by gradients. Humans didn’t just magically become conscious one day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Question: is it better to read indiscriminately hundreds of books, of which only a few are literary classics. Or to devote oneself to only reading the classics of philosophy, history, and so on...