Have you ever watched "sharknado" ? do you want radio active sharks in a hurricane?!?!?!? because thats how you get radioactive sharks in a hurricane!!!! #Sharknado
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Awesomeness
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Only one way to find out...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's just saying things we have ALL wondered.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No fission bomb would make a dent. Enough MT from a thermonuclear device could disrupt internal circulation for 8 hours. Either one would distribute the radioactive byproducts into the entire system making a Manga-style radioactive hurricane. Would be awesome.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need the Mythbusters. Adam and Jamie, come back!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My "back-of-the-envelope" calculation for Hurricane Andrew is that the energy required to evacuate it's eye to its landfal eye pressure of 922 mbar is roughly 10^17 megatons of TNT. At it's peak in 1967 the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal was less than 30,000 * 10 = 3*10^5 Megatons
-
In other words, the energy packed by Hurricane Andrew was roughly 3 trillion times greater than the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal in 1967.
-
We obviously need myth buster to get right on this. For “further evaluation.”
-
The magnitude is really in getting the conversion from millibar-liter to megaton correct - which I did carefully to minimize the chance of an error. After that - the pressure difference and eye size are well known values, easily googled.
-
How would the radiation output be at an altitude of about 30,000-50,000 feet.
-
It doesn't matter. We don't have the capability to affect a major storm. The Pentagon toyed in the 1960's with possibly disrupting the eyewall by firing *dozens* of missiles up into the eye from submarines - but abandoned it as too expensive for a one-time long shot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Never said it...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Create a vacuum collapsing the eye. Stopping rotation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A sharknado. That’s what would happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1.Prove he said it. This hypothesis-shit been around long time. Axios is not credible. But go with it. Makes ppl spin up and go crazy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I knew I remembered this topic having been discussed over 20 years ago.https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/11/hurricanes-weather-history-nuclear-weapons/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.