I don’t expect members of the public to understand what a motion to intervene is, or understand that Alex Jones is being sued for conduct outside the statute of limitations period. But reporters covering these cases should get educated. @Barnes_Lawhttps://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1153010757442760704 …
-
-
“Reporters” who don’t understand the legal system think Alex Jones is a one-off. But that’s not how the law works. If case law establishes that you are liable for what your AUDIENCE does (even when you don’t ask them to do anything), then it’s lawsuit city for every outlet.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it reasonable today to expect the law to be applied using consistent principles? (serious question)
-
No. Serious answer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is genius work Mike!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can’t wait
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't you make the same argument against politicians like AOC whose specific language is used by terrorists? ("Concentration camps")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are past the point of the law being applied equally. If the elites want you taken down they will figure out a way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
They will use this as scare tactics for any person that has channels and exposes truth. All of these events are specifically used to go after truth spreaders to silence them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
against the SPLC.