Many people film me. It’s a burden of being hot. I filed the original motion to unseal. The Second Court of Appeals ruled in my favor. 2,000 Jeff Epstein documents will be released because of me. You’re welcome. https://www.cernovich.com/jeff-epstein-files/ …https://twitter.com/sandibachom/status/1152735622190305280 …
-
-
Replying to @Cernovich
Didn’t Dershowitz seek to intervene and unseal first in 2016?pic.twitter.com/LMga7yYA71
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @williamcraddick
He asked for 3 pages only that he wanted to cherry pick. I sought the entire summary judgment record. Miami Herald wanted entire record, which wasn’t going to happen. CTA2 sided with me and granted the unsealing of 2,000 pages.
3 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich
But Maxwell’s motion summary judgement alone would be extremely one sided against Giuffre. Why not at least also seek to unseal the response as well? Giuffre’s counsel claimed Dershowitz was using your motion to get records he wanted when you first intervened.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @williamcraddick
No, it's full record. Not just Maxwell motion. This is all in the CTA2 opinion. Miami Herald wanted FULL record and was denied. That was too much of an ask. I asked for all SJ records and exhibits, and that's exactly what Court said would be public. Giuffre wants this public.pic.twitter.com/N0tvyVEOXS
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich @williamcraddick
"Importantly, the plaintiff in this case – a possible victim of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell – does not object to unsealing." I gather you're a buddy of Creepy Lee. Lee can't read basic legal documents. Scamming off my name. You should know better. https://bit.ly/2JTl0Wi pic.twitter.com/PXvooHnm5V
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich
Giuffre doesn't object to unsealing now since the litigation was settled. She did originally. What does this have to do with Lee? I just want to know why Giuffre's counsel made this argument when you first intervened. https://www.scribd.com/document/341015186/Giuffre-v-Maxwell-Response-to-Motion-to-Unseal-Opposition …pic.twitter.com/KgpRixHMRH
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
I sought full records. It’s in the court opinion. Read that and then if you’re still confused, read it again.pic.twitter.com/GXYCUeKVOF
-
-
Replying to @Cernovich
I'm not looking at the Second Circuit opinion, I'm looking at your original motion. Which seems to only seek documents related to Maxwell's motion for summary judgement. Not Giuffre's response in opposition to that motion. That's what Giuffre's attorneys said as well.pic.twitter.com/2ViMmZl1aq
0 replies 3 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.