Many people film me. It’s a burden of being hot. I filed the original motion to unseal. The Second Court of Appeals ruled in my favor. 2,000 Jeff Epstein documents will be released because of me. You’re welcome. https://www.cernovich.com/jeff-epstein-files/ …https://twitter.com/sandibachom/status/1152735622190305280 …
-
No, it's full record. Not just Maxwell motion. This is all in the CTA2 opinion. Miami Herald wanted FULL record and was denied. That was too much of an ask. I asked for all SJ records and exhibits, and that's exactly what Court said would be public. Giuffre wants this public.pic.twitter.com/N0tvyVEOXS
"Importantly, the plaintiff in this case – a possible victim of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell – does not object to unsealing." I gather you're a buddy of Creepy Lee. Lee can't read basic legal documents. Scamming off my name. You should know better. https://bit.ly/2JTl0Wi pic.twitter.com/PXvooHnm5V
-
-
Giuffre doesn't object to unsealing now since the litigation was settled. She did originally. What does this have to do with Lee? I just want to know why Giuffre's counsel made this argument when you first intervened. https://www.scribd.com/document/341015186/Giuffre-v-Maxwell-Response-to-Motion-to-Unseal-Opposition …pic.twitter.com/KgpRixHMRH
-
I sought full records. It’s in the court opinion. Read that and then if you’re still confused, read it again.pic.twitter.com/GXYCUeKVOF
-
I'm not looking at the Second Circuit opinion, I'm looking at your original motion. Which seems to only seek documents related to Maxwell's motion for summary judgement. Not Giuffre's response in opposition to that motion. That's what Giuffre's attorneys said as well.pic.twitter.com/2ViMmZl1aq
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
when roughly (day? time?) should we expect the release. ty.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.