The media is lying. The Ilhan Omar brother story hasn’t been debunked. Credible evidence including public marriage records suggests it’s true. In lawyers terms, the story is proven by a “preponderance of the evidence.”
Show this thread
-
There are three narratives re: Ilhan Omar and her brother. 1. She married her brother. (Proof is offered via public records.) 2. She didn't marry her brother. The story has been debunked. (No refutation of public records tho.) 3. No one knows for sure.https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/jul/18/did-ilhan-omar-marry-her-brother-her-hometown-news/ …
Show this thread
"Fact-checking" sites are slanted left. It's revealing that Snopes and Politifact call the Ilhan Omar brother story "undetermined" rather than false. The *best defense* they can offer is to say it's not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.https://www.cernovich.com/mike-cernovich-fact-check/ …
-
-
You can *honestly* say that you don't find the evidence proving Ilhan Omar married her brother conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt. You *cannot* honestly call the story debunked. Not even left-wing Snopes or Politifact call the story debunked.https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ilhan-omar-marry-brother/ …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the most critical issue here was did she come in as a refugee under false identity. This is an issue. If this is the case then everything else after is compounding a felony. Not sure what the proof is but this is what they are saying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So it should go to court, then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I need this on Facebook
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even ‘Snopes’ is slanted to the left on many topics. Not a ‘go-to’ source anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doesn’t someone check their backgrounds before running for office? With so much top secret information these people in Congress have access to. One would think some type of background check. Certain criteria has to be met.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So don’t trust fact checkers. What you’re seeing and what you’re reading are not what’s really happening.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it was a Trump story they would say "Potentially TRUE!" and leave it at that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always though it lazy to use *fact checker* sites. I prefer to look at bills authored/sponsored, voting record, stated platform, cpacs etc https://votesmart.org/ https://www.openthebooks.com/ http://www.opensecrets.org/ Be your own fact checker!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By Kavanaugh standards, she must prove she did not marry her brother.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps they dare not dig any deeper
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.