SDNY this year charged Epstein for codnxuf going back to 2002.
@PreetBharara was head of SDNY from 2009 to 2017.
Which means he could have charged Epstein for 2002 crimes in 2017, just as SDNY is doing in 2019.
A lot of lawyers read me. You’re embarrassing yourself @eliehonig.https://twitter.com/eliehonig/status/1148005712007749632 …
-
-
Again, how do you know they “sat on it?” You don’t know when they had a sufficient amount of chargeable evidence. Have you ever prosecuted a case? Do you know what goes into that process & decision?
-
Is there a profession where people ask these types of questions to powerful people?
-
The fact that a search warrant was just approved means that new - NEW - evidence has come to light. Allow me to explain that concept. You see, new means it’s new. It’s not old, it’s new. So like, it was 2019 new, not 2002 new.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Miami Herald and
@jkbjournalist drove this story. Your ego is so big I’m surprised you can walk through doorways.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe we could ask why, with a 53 page indictment in hand,
@SecretaryAcosta chose to give Epstein, 4 co-conspirators and any "unnamed conspirators" Federal immunity. You don't happen to know where he's working at the moment do you?pic.twitter.com/32qk5piBcn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You mean the work you did to help
@AlanDersh in getting “certain sealed records in order to cherry pick so he could ATTACK the VICTIMS with” you mean. Please.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.