Mike CernovichVerified account

She's a single-issue candidate. Even her website lacks any sort of vision. Just "No more wars" and some trite sentences about clean air and clean water.

Ikr. The moderator asked her about the gender wage gap. She replied with her foreign policy

Because it's all she's got.

I think she should serve the role as SECSTATE. It would be much better fit for her and she knows it.

That might actually be very fitting. At least she acknowledged last night that a clear attack on our military (people, not drones) would deserve a proportionate response. Credit to her for that. But America's problems are far larger than stupid wars.

I disagree, Americas wars cost the U.S. trillions, they diminish our freedoms, they've destroyed millions of lives, domestic and foreign.

Agreed but running on that idea alone will not get you elected.

I think running strong on that idea at all, will be the reason she is not elected. Being vehemently anti-war is a no no for the establishment left or right.

Her Medicare for all position won’t fly

I'm down for it. I'm sick to death of decades of a majority of U.S. tax payer spending going for war. Especially wars without purpose & mission that are meant to go on forever. Which includes every one of them since 2001.