Socrates (470-399 BC) was a Greek philosopher who sought to get to the foundations of his students' and colleagues' views by asking continual questions until a contradiction was exposed, thus proving the fallacy of the initial assumption. This became known as the Socratic Method.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like to compare whataboutism to legal precedents
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When I saw "what about X?!" I'm not saying they're both fine. I'm questioning the selective outrage!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Judas
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would double like this post if it were possible!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Lol "cognitive peasants"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good for deflecting and topic redirection
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
It shows that a person's supposed razor is not Occam-tastic. It leaves stubble.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was a fantastic interview by
@DarrenJBeattieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Esoteric
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, the left is defined by intellectual laziness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True dat!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree, it is how it is used to avoid answering a question that is questionable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes! When underlying rational is applied properly to different context it reveals new perspective and many times the flaw in logic.pic.twitter.com/QFda3DeWrQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. However, often the what about arguments are flawed logically or conflate issues. This is probably intentional. It is rare to have an honest debate, especially on twitter. People get so crazy. Fine - we disagree. That doesn’t have to make either of us evil.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is that people don't typically use "Whataboutisms" in a Socratic way. They use them to downplay their side's issues and highlight the other side's issues. E.g: "Bobby hit Sally" "What about when Sally hit Eric?" Well, Bobby still freakin' hit Sally.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.