Because Sleeping Giant and @oliverdarcy will lobby to make sure all of their hard work is destroyed.
People are saying hard news is expensive. Yes and the left funds it. Why don’t conservatives fund hard news operations?https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1133121582660894720 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
They don't even have to lift a finger, just need to fund those who will, but too afraid of getting called bad names..they are worse than the opposition we are fighting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Remember when news was “this happened, and let me tell you when”... sounds pretty inexpensive to me! Anyone with a cellphone and wifi access could relay the information! Nobody needs these piss poor partisan editorials to tell us what to think about what just happened!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm honestly a little afraid (professionally) of having donations from me to project veritas in the public domain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The
#Left does not fund it, they create it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are too afraid of being outed by MSM as supporting conservative causes which means they will be called racists...they are the epitome of all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing...they don't even have to DO all they have to do is fund...so weak
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Follow the money. Rich conservatives give money to charity, rich liberals give money to media. Liberals should consider themselves lucky Chick-fil-A donates to the Salvation Army rather than NPR.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They get hunted down and silenced, like Gavin, or Lauren Southern. It is not they don't want to. Sometimes they are just not allowed to
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Manufacturing divisive disinfo is easier when you respond to real, " hard" news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Their aim is to lose, but remain part of the oligarchy. I think Andrew Breitbart was the last “conservative” who actually wanted to win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
CNN International is a hard news operation. Its parent organization is not. The Wall Street Journal
@WSJ 's factual reporting is hard news, though its editorial page reflects the poltics of its corporate parent, News Corp (through Dow, Jones and Company).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
News Corp has one working hard news outlet, the Wall Street Journal. Even critics of WSJs editorial board admit its factual reporting is and always has been solid. It'd be worthwhile for Fox News, while it's reinventing itself, to bring the
@WSJ news desk in for factual news.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disposable income. Making 100k/yr means having 20k in free cash vs making 80k/yr and barely breaking even. This principle scales with wealth and for some reason conservative billionaires are not activists. But then again, I dont think leftist billionaires spend their own $$
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Judicial watch does
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.