Mike CernovichVerified account

You are trying to ultimately make a comparison between your pizzagate dissemination and this SPLC thing. That if they shouldn't be liable then why should people come down on you right? Well I am not saying you should be criminally or civilly liable. In America your pizzagate

I just realized you clearly said not legally liable but morally culpable. But the thrust of my argument stands. SLPC is a thorough, factually accurate description of FRC and the snopes article thoroughly addresses the SPLC promoting it claim.

Neither "Pizzagate," nor true but not representative articles about extremist behavior of primarily minorities are neither of those things.

I take it in life you are important and expect people to treat you with deference. But such tactics as you use not needed. This is a conversation in good faith. Should the SPLC use more caution when labeling groups “hate groups” in light of an actual domestic terror incident.

They should not shy away from describing the activities of organizations that espouse beliefs like this:

"“While activists like to claim that pedophilia is a completely distinct orientation from homosexuality, evidence shows a disproportionate overlap between the two. … It is a homosexual problem.” — FRC President Tony Perkins, FRC website, 2010"

By merely including these groups on their site, they have not displayed anything that suggests that greater caution would have prevented anything that happened.

And I am on Twitter in the middle of a Monday afternoon, so no, not important. I am just an entrepreneur/small time attorney struggling with ADHD, and no one currently should or does treat me with deference.