Yes because pro-choice is ur child while lack of taking mandated vaccines puts others at risk. But in spirit it is contradictory because if u want "gov off my body" then u can't want gov to be onto others' bodies for vaccines. Instead, you would ask gov to keep those ppl home.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
My wife’s grandmother lived to be 97. She only had a handful of vaccinations. I grew up in the 70’s and 80’s with few. Medicine has become big business. I fear that when I go to hospital I will be treated according to my ability to pay. My point is more tests to get more money.
-
I never thought to really learn about vaccines until my son was injured. It IS a business, a test lab, a social experiment. And our nation is so sick.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do not see the connection. Sorry
-
Pro-choicers want gov’t out of their bodies. Them & their doctors make decisions. Pro-vax-mandaters want gov’t to force inject ppl against their will, regardless of what the patient (& now even doctor, see CA) have decided.
-
Well I agree Governments should stay out of many things. The only relation between these two things then is government intervention as they are not related any other way. You might as well throw in seatbelts laws which is government mandated but intrusive.
-
Seatbelts don’t alter the immune system, so not really an appropriate analogy.
-
You have missed my point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tfw you realize the entire reason medical licensing exists is so that the government can tell you what you can't and must do with your body.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lots of confusing angles. If vaccines choice =pro choice, then vaccine mandate = pro life? Or vaccine mandate = abortion mandate? Or vaccine choice = fetal choice, hence vaccine choice = pro life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The government is already in both...aren't pro-lifers already paying into PP by tax laws? And PP gives millions of dollars to political candidates of their choosing. As for vaccines, they use aborted fetal tissue in vaccines. PP AND big pharma play a role in everything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These are the companies with interests in the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture this poison....Follow the money and the trail leads to NWO Eugenicists! Notice WHERE these companies call home.
-
Du Pont U.S. 40,047 2,310 143.9 BASF Group Ger. 28,856 685 134.1 Hoechst Group Ger. 27,766 927 172.9 Bayer Group Ger. 25,773 1,164 171.0 ICI U.K. 23,034 1,101 132.1 Dow Chemicals U.S. 19,773 1,384 62.1 Rhône-Poulenc France 14,473 356 91.6
-
Ciba-Geigy Switz. 14,183 744 94.1 Montedison Italy 13,971 207 44.6 Akzo Holl. 9,491 364 70.5 Asahi Chemicals Japan 9,202 302 25.9 Monsanto U.S. 8,995 490 41.1 Solvay Group Belg. 7,638 501 45.7 Unionee Carbide U.S.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hahahhaaaa!!!! Ahhhhhh, Mike, Mike, Mike. Hahahahaa!!! : )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's just a more specific subset of "pro-choice about what?" If bodies are the limiting factor, then prostitution and the right to work at whatever wage should be permissible choices.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tough if your position is Her body her choice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.