Many liberals have been mindwashed into believing they have the moral high ground. A “woman’s right to choose” > a baby’s right to life. They don’t think about it much beyond that.
Scott Adams is right - Democrats don’t want to literally murder newborns. Also true - Democrats are so afraid of the pro-abortion lobby that they won’t condemn post-birth abortion (which is literal baby killing).https://twitter.com/DorseeM/status/1122618914544996353 …
-
-
-
Serious question: What does thinking have to do with it? (I don’t see a lot of thinking going around anywhere nowadays).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why are you accepting the dehumanizing of babies by Scott Adams? A baby that a doctor deems to be dying is still a baby, and killing the baby is still an execution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They can't even bring themselves to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. That when child that was in the process of being aborted ends up coming out alive. All the legislation says is that the doctors ave to treat the baby as they would any baby post birth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah there is the usual hyperbole here, but it seems immaterial. I don’t think that opponents ppl believe that there is some kinda bloodlust, but just that they are willing to exterminate a live born infant. Fair and prope use of hyperbole if there is one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politicians don't support post birth abortions YET but its already being pushed in academic circles, just like the denial of sexual dimorphism was pushed in leftist academic circles before it became policy - check out this article from a leading journalhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/39/5/261 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We don’t hear many democrats saying that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't accept what
@ScottAdamsSays. about this. The agenda is eugenics and the monetization of organs, blood products and stem cells.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they don’t want to do it while doing it they are just lying to us all. And laughing at people debating if they have a soul to begin with
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
If people really thought that abortion was the moral equivalent of say murdering a 5 year old infant, then I would expect there to be much more robust and even violent protest demanding justice. People play politics on both sides.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Please supply one example of a viable foetus being born and then murdered without any medical reason.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you hadn’t seen the Governor’s full statement, maybe you missed this. I usually try not to attribute malice when stupidity’s to blame but in this abortion debate it’s becoming really hard to tell the difference.pic.twitter.com/f8M92f5CP2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t functionally see a difference, Mike.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
But they do, some Democrats literally want post-birth abortions. If that isn't murdering a baby, what is?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not buying your first sentence. They’ve shown that they want to push this envelope as much as they possibly can. If the baby was targeted for abortion, they’re ok with killing the baby if it survives-and think they should have the right to do so. Heartbeat bills save lives.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.