You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It’s an empirical fact that the U.S. could not win a Great War without nuclear weapons. 75% of men are ineligible to serve due to obesity or criminal conviction. Read the report “Unfit to Fight.” But the generals all worried about issues like trans and women in Ranger school.https://twitter.com/35boat/status/1121831521529233411 …
We don’t have enough men to win a non-nuclear war.
Generals are a bunch of wimps focused on marginal issues like women in Ranger school and trans soldiers, rather than legitimate issues like this 
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/10/10/americas-obesity-is-threatening-national-security-according-to-this-study/ …
Tax breaks for health!
Such a sad picture
This seems like something that is impossible to stop. Are we in Americas end game?
Absolutely correct. The Chinese could march over with sticks and we’d be overrun.
They have attempted to Install a Forever War and they plan to send unfit men, women and trans people to the front-lines "The Good Ol Fashion Way" like James Jones and the Obama Regime wanted.
That’s why we have drones.
But, from an economic stand point, if we were to start outlawing/banning/taxing 'sugar drinks' or 'candy bars' then how does that NOT also hurt the domestic US producer side of the economy. Demand creates its own supply. But if there is no supply - then no revenue, no taxes, etc.
Mike, there will be no major war without nuclear weapons, because if one superpower start to lose, they will resort to nukes.
Depends on a lot of factors.
meanwhile, put some of those basement dwellers in the military. they'll shape up pretty fast or they won't.
And you think USA can win a nuclear war? Do you really think a nuclear war will remain limited to a region or country? Never mind.. keep believing in whatever you want.
Once China and/or Russia get countermeasure-resistant hypersonic missiles that can neutralize America's aircraft carriers that's all she wrote as far as US force projection around the world if it interferes with their interests.
Instead of disqualifying people above a certain body mass threshold why not accept them & send them to “preboot camp” training where it is based on getting those individuals in shape & teaching them skills like, mechanics, construction, tech, or other military necessary skills.
Those individuals have shown they are wanting to enlist so we need to find a way of improving them instead of rejecting them. It’s an overall benefit to the country. Less people are over weight & more people are enlisted.
Promotions above O-5 are typically political rather than leadership and military strategy
Most that are not obese and somewhat fit don’t have the belief and passion for their country due to our education system and MSM
I'm not sure about that decline yet. We have a lot of fancy force multipliers and would inflict disproportional losses on a conventional military - especially in the early stages of a conflict. We also have unmatched logistics and basing to keep the fancy tech supplied.
We wouldn't need to win a war if the feds would just mind their own business.
You said it and you have exposed your military's ultimate winning strategy #Masada
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
