Mike CernovichVerified account

Depends. On who is in the white house. If it's a guy they like, they will cover up and spin any military action in his favour. If it's a guy they dislike, they will launch a war of words on him.

Depends who is in the White House

Whatever there told to be, by the people who pull the strings.

Strongly gaslighting-narcissistic- fear-striking... so yes, strongly pro-war

All crusty pols are war mongers at their core. Wars put lots of money in the pockets of these leeches. I would go so far at to say that every war America has played an active role in since the Revolutionary has been foisted on it's ppl through lies, subterfuge and obfuscation.

War = eyeballs Eyeballs = advertising $ Corporate media loves war

They're pro-war with particular countries and particular administrations.

Lol depends who's in the WH. If a Dem, the media says war is necessary. If a Republican war is evil.

Media has a reputation for being Left-wing but only on social issues. When it comes to foreign policy, especially anything directed against Russia and Putin, they're pure hawks.

Depends on whether there is a Republican or Democrat administration. The MSM is pro whatever the democratic Administration is doing and against whatever a Republican administration is doing.

I no longer consider the mainstream media.

It depends. If military engagement serves in the interests of USA, Israel, and the industrial military complex then yes, I think the MSM is generally pro-war. After all, they’re a propaganda machine financed by special interests.

If it bleeds it leads. Just look at the last Hurricane, CNN was all but salivating that people’s homes were going to be destroyed. It was grotesque.

I would go as far as to make the assertion that 2/3rd of the wars in the past 70 or so years could not have found widespread support amongst the people if it were not for some form of national or international media organization.

With sponsors like Raytheon, Boeing, Mcdonnell Douglas, et al, what choice do they have?