If his name is already out there in relation to a defamation suit against one of Epstein's (British) ex's, what does he stand to gain? Seems to me former prez Clinton has much more to gain by keeping this info from (US) public, despite his already damaged reputation.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most plausible but WOWZER.https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1109122724050300928?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Based on a court doc I saw, it’s a man and woman. I think it’s Andrew and Rachel Chan dler.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Don’t assume. Hopefully, the judge will deny the document seal. Keep fighting!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes sense
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about others in the family? Andrew is the obvious choice and to be fair I doubt anyone really knows who he is or would really care... outside of the woke community (out of the public at least)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow if true!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the clintons
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then we so need transparency!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
