Mike CernovichVerified account

I'd be happy to have a debate with almost anyone in the IDW about almost anything. Whether I'm actually in the IDW, I have no idea...

I'd love to see you and JBP talk about polyamory, as its not something I get the impression he would immediately be on board with or understand (although I could be wrong)

Yep. I think @jordanbpeterson and I would have enough common ground (re. pros & cons of different mating systems) to appreciate each other's views, but enough differences to make for a useful discussion.

Agreed. Especially considering your pro natalism stance, I feel like the chances of @jordanbpeterson being open minded to it are much hire than if he was talking to the more stereotypical anti-natalist poly crowd (who, sadly, often overlap with the far left progressive crowd)

They’re remarkably easy to find if you actually desire to find them.

Bret Weinstein vs Richard Dawkins on Evolutionary bio though it’s not capital P Political. Eric Weinstein also debated Yaron Brook from the Ayn Rand Institute about market failure. Many of the early IDW discussions were debates amongst themselves too. Big one was Sam v Eric.

I asked to debate one of the Progressive ones on Climate Change. No answer.

That’s because they think it’s settled science and to have a debate is to give a speech platform to a viewpoint that is not in the realm of rational toleration. It in fact is a political framework given the name ‘repressive toleration.’

That’s a really long way to say “I think I’d lose.”

Sam Harris has Ezra Klein on his podcast where they discussed Charles Murray and race