drug patents? They are granted for 7 yrs and therapies cost abt $13B & about 10 yrs to get to market, *if they pass clinicals. I wouldn't say it's a monopoly. Its FDA issue. Patents protect costs of innovation, development and launch. The cost of drugs is also an issue.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Abuse of Patent Protections is definitely a Core part of problem. But part of the issue is that even after patents expire, generic drug competition doesn't seem to bring down prices the way they naively should...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems healthcare-related discourse is focused in the wrong areas. All healthcare issues stem from insurance companies et al, the systemic flaws that encourage/allow the crazy pricing and tainted information flow. The “cost” of any of the products or services is a distraction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s the difference between a pharmaceutical and a supplement? I generally do not know. Supplement laws are much more lenient
-
Supplements supplement compounds that are already in and needed by the human body to function properly. Some vitamins, amino acids and can be manufactured by our bodies *if* we eat foods with w/raw ingredients - others come from what we ingest. Drugs are non-natural compounds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Patents are a goverment granted monopoly as an incentive for innovation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Excessive patents can kill innovation, there is a difference between an incentive and a free market destroying indefinite monopoly. Balance is the key.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because drug development is an incredibly time-consuming, risky and expensive process. What is the incentive to innovate if you can’t even have a few years of exclusivity as a reward for bringing the drug to market in the first place?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Where do drug companies get money to develop drugs? They have to raise capital from investors. How will you pitch a venture to investors that will costs hundreds of million of dollars and have a success rate of under 15% if you can’t even recoup the costs through high prices?
-
The US essentially subsidizes drug R&D for most of the world because the most risk tolerant investors are in the US — they know that if they get a home run drug, they will make astronomical returns. Remove that incentive and you seriously stifle innovation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Most ignore the government barriers to enter the drug market.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Last time I checked Big Pharma contributions were about equal to Dems and Reps. How do you break it down?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why medical cannabis is an issue at all. It bypasses the patent protection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
The patents play only a small role and can help with product developement. It is raising prices on older drugs, like insulin, that demonstrate the real problem - monopoly power.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's like the law of gravity. Any government regulator will eventually become regulated by the industry it purports to regulate. Then they will erect barriers to entry to insulate their own business from competition. See Facebook offering to help write up social media regulation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Pharmaceutical advertising needs to be eliminated from TV again. That was a huge mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.