HUGE: Microsoft Installs Neocon-built "Fake News" Filter as Default Setting on Mobile Browsers "REAL" - CNN, BuzzFeed, HuffPo, Media Matters, Rolling Stone, Weekly Standard "FAKE" - Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, The Daily Mail, The Drudge Report, WikiLeakshttps://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/01/23/microsoft-teams-with-establishment-newsguard-to-create-news-blacklist/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @LibertarianBlue @Cernovich
I’d maybe move Wikileaks to real as they did put out important cables... but yeah looks about right.
7 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @andrewkimmel @LibertarianBlue
Can you point out a story by Breitbart that approached the level of the Rolling Stone rape hoax?https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/business/media/rape-uva-rolling-stone-frat.html …
2 replies 32 retweets 140 likes -
Replying to @Cernovich @LibertarianBlue
Definitely not - Breitbart doesn’t have the legacy or following or credits to ever come close to that level. Their one-sided reporting fails to get much attention as the content is easily digested by the readers it caters to and is taken with a grain of salt.
9 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Breitbart doesn’t have the following? Rolling Stone traffic ranking: 2,274 globally, 641st in the US Breitbart: 277 globally, 59th in the US Buzzfeed: 294 globally, 93 in the US You’re a partisan with no examples. You want them censored because they won’t confirm your biases.
9 replies 31 retweets 218 likes -
Again that was in March 2018. The high traffic #’s I gave you are from Jan 2019. Funny enough they also outrank Politico in traffic. Weird you’d use them as a source for diminishing popularity when they are far lower in traffic rankings. Can you admit you’re wrong?
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Fair enough regarding traffic (although what’s to say that they aren’t engaging in ad fraud a la Newsweek). I also mentioned legacy/credits. Have they had any major verified bombshells that would cause a similar response to the rape hoax report?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Three conversations. 1. Whether their web traffic is down. 2. Loss of influence as their stories don't "cross over" to MSM. 3. My original point - Rolling Stone shared a massive hoax. How can they ever be considered per se reliable?
-
-
If there are consistently reporting errors across multiple stories is when I’d consider a “reputable” outlet unreliable. This was one story. That doesn’t negate every story prior and after it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.