Mike CernovichVerified account

Instead of killing him, how about you change him and lead him down a different path. Like in Looper.

This was a Twilight Zone reboot episode about this. http://twilightzone.wikia.com/wiki/Cradle_of_Darkness …

It’s also a goid evidence philosophy is an intellectual fraud then. There are no ethical answer in adressing a question that assumes omniscience when the core of the issue is that we never know anything for sure.

My primary answer is no, because a baby is innocent. My secondary answer is no, because I do not know with certainty that the new timeline created by the death of Hitler would be "better" or "worse" than the existing one. For ex., if Hitler was dead would a "worse" hitler exist?

You don’t even need the context to know what the ethics are.

Change the name to Trump and see the current US response among Progressives.

Even the Atlantic. Good one.

Anyone else see the parallels to Oedipus?

What's even scarier is if killing Hitler doesn't WW2. Rather, the evil spirit chooses another to poses and spill blood.

Read the Bible. It is never right to kill an innocent .

all of the competition wouldn't have been destroyed making The United States the most prosperous post war country. we wouldn't have atomic bombs or constant war.

What if...One of the men Hitler killed was going to produce a son who would be TWICE as bad as Hitler. Hitler kept that son from being conceived, saving tens-of millions of lives in the process.

No Fate is ever written in stone.

I think I know the answer, but I keep it to myself.

The debate isn’t one of going back to get rid of a person. The question is if one should even go back at all. To travel back in time and change Anything would alter not only Baby Hitlers time line but also everyone else’s. The morality of affecting billions of lives.

Why don't they also talk about killing baby Lenin/Stalin as well these were also responsible for 30 million deaths.