But so far they are asking us to trust them trusting two people we dont know and they havent seen evidence. Sorry, I have five stories with retractions and corrections and another from last week saying there is no evidence of collusion
Buzzfeed vets sources aggressively and I don’t see @BuzzFeedBen running a bunk story at this level.
Always fair to be skeptical, as these stories often aren’t as big as they seem.
But their processes more strict than most know.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No evidence, no credibility. We've heard so many times about unseen evidence that is going to take down Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But aren’t they known for this? This certainly wouldn’t be first time. If process so strict why so many problems with credibility?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have two unnamed sources and have seen zero evidence from said sources. Seems legit.
-
The sources are vetted. This would imply BuzzFeed knows their names and confirmed their access to the investigation.
-
"Vetted"? thats a very expansive word - especially for BuzzFeed. Sorry I don't buy this because I don't trust BuzzFeed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Three things: 1. Why did they publish the Dossier then? 2. Why is Ben saying that the reporters have never lied, when that is 100% BS? Even libs have pointed this out. 3. Why the deflection when Buzzfeed is being asked about contradicting stories this morning?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He ran the Steele Russian Dossier story with no vetting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s been the case over...and over...again w/ newsies & yet they’re wrong. Could it be intentional misleading by sources for a reason?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Just like the Dossier story they posted?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have already presented contradictions about this story. Don't be so gullible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The source proof of the article will be an opinion memo written by James Comey and seen, but not in the possession of the sources.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even Mueller called it fake news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which means Trump is in huge trouble. It’s hard to imagine Buzzfeed botching a story of this magnitude. It’s also inconceivable trump is so dumb that he would tell his fixer to lie to Congress over something that wasn’t a crime. And I’m a MAGA guy saying this
-
Nope.
-
Buzzfeed ran the Dossier. One of their reporters, who also wrote this story, ran a report saying Karl Rove was about to get indicted and his sources were those from the DOJ. How did those turn out?
-
I did see that. And I also hope this is false. But what is concerning is the tepid response from trump and his team to this. They’re acting guilty imo
-
What is their tepid response? Do you watch Fox which is Trump's PR network? They all pretty much blasted buzzfeed
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.