Basic game theory. You could run this simulation 1,000’s of times and same result: Team A - always defends its own side. Team B - defends its own side sometimes. Team A (the left) wins. There is no stopping it. The only question is how soon until they take total power.
-
-
It didn't turn out like that on Arrakis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Read the last chapter of the book....you're stuck at the crucifixion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This only occurs in specific environments and only for a short time. See game theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By that logic, the world should always become more barbaric, when the opposite has happened. Barbarism is always most superficially appealing, but its rule is fleeting when people wake up to its realities
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Otherwise we would all be speaking Mongol.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Often, yes. But if the most barbaric always won, wouldn't have developed civilization at all...
-
The empirical Japanese and National Socialist Germans would be considered to be more barbaric and cruel than the western democracies they were facing and yet still lost.
-
Imperial*
-
Disagree! Germans were not “barbaric”, they were “intellectual” . That’s what made them more dangerous!
-
Barbaric as in cruel and inhuman on an industrial scale. Mass murder of civilians was a science to the Third Reich.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This is a related thought from the excellent
#VladimirBukovsky I love this quotepic.twitter.com/WcQuUBVf2P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.