Yeah, kinda. But that assumes no recruitment and no defections among teams. If Team B attracts smarter, more rational, more successful, more open-minded, more attractive people, by virtue of being less doctrinaire, they may win the long game...
Basic game theory. You could run this simulation 1,000’s of times and same result: Team A - always defends its own side. Team B - defends its own side sometimes. Team A (the left) wins. There is no stopping it. The only question is how soon until they take total power.
-
-
-
On a long enough timeline, the most cruel and barbaric win because the good are too weak to stop them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Basic law of unintended consequences: As a result of the 25% shutdown, the gov't works better/more efficiently, paving the model for smaller gov't initiatives in the future - carved out shutdowns to test the fragility of the system. TSA & others, classified as essential.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Team A - always wants bigger government, more power Temm B - sometimes wants bigger government, more power Team C - always wants smaller government, less power Team A wins. Team C put into camps.
-
team A or B gets a bigger government and the money supply funding that government finally hits a tipping point and hyperinflates and both A and B lose and Bitcoin holders win.
-
Team C owns all the guns.
-
goddamn right brother, team C might preach principles that won't win majority consensus, but they're prepared for the outcome that they don't move the needle enough to enact their principles; gold (Bitcoin), guns, food, and community.
-
as far as those team Cs outside of the US, well you're not really team C because you let them take your guns without making the streets run red with politician blood.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Something tells me that you are not an expert in game theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whenever they become a majority. Ergo why they support these initiatives. - Immigration (to increase their own group) - Abortion (to decrease the other group)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A massive LOL at the idea that there's no infighting among the left.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
California for example.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In trench warfare, you can’t have just one side use the mustard gas and expect your noble ideas to win. That’s how you end up being exterminated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It might not be that simple. Each team might attack members of it's own side or even those that aren't strongly tied to a team at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Not this time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doesn’t help that team B also contains players from team A but the referee (the people) never noticed. Until Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.