Exactly. I never heard his opponent's name until I read this article.pic.twitter.com/PrYDNTrU0y
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Exactly. I never heard his opponent's name until I read this article.pic.twitter.com/PrYDNTrU0y
This is the way his opponents canvassers are behaving.pic.twitter.com/k5ncF3GXcA
GREAT observation. Lawn signs have long been a reliable predictor of electoral success. Also, loved the trailer.pic.twitter.com/zu2GQ3vW7i
While I generally agree with you Ray on signs they're not completely useless. I have been walking with a first time candidate and amazed how many people know her just because of the signs. Predictive value? Still agree though I think # of signs less important than who has them.
I’ll certainly take your word for it, but I know of no voter ever who walked into a polling station thinking “I wasn’t sure who I was going to vote for today, but then I saw a lawn sign and it all just made sense.”
That I agree with. My point is simply they are a tool to help name recognition which is a bigger hurdle in down ballot races.
My point has always been that they are over-valued. Lawn signs are fine, but if voters never hear directly from the name on the sign, they are are worthless. And I will go to my grave believing they are not an accurate barometer of support.
Agreed completely.
Fake polls
"race remains tight polls show" Because if 2016 taught us nothing else, it taught us to trust the polls! Ha!
#MAGA3X
All Dems using their first names only in campaigning. Must be new nationwide strategy
You know, for such a famously evil guy, you get very few responses to your tweets.
His opponent must be running a Fraudulent "Mail-In Ballot" Campaign...
Like all politicians he just needs more money, haha.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.