Testimony FROM THE ACCUSER is NOT evidence. Never has been. Never will be.
-
-
-
where did you take your Evidence class? ask them for a tuition refund
-
Just amazing how liberals re-write rules and definition of laws to fit their narrative...

-
Hahahahahahaha okay. Please show me in the Federal Rules of Evidence where there is any prohibition on an accuser's testimony being used as evidence. I'll wait.https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
A reminder the real victim today is Karen Monahan, who had the SHT beat out of her by 2nd in command of the DNC Keith Ellison > She will never have a chance to publicly tell her story > She will never receive justice > The party of women has failed Karen And no one care.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You've clearly fallen for the emotion. She literally has zero evidence and witnesses she claimed could back her up, didn't.
-
Almost like there should be more investigation...you know...since you're all so keen on evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She has no credible evidence. That doesn't matter, all she has to do is look credible. credible enough to peel off Collins an Murkowski.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So why didn’t they call Mark Judge to testify? He was in the room. He literally wrote a memoir abt getting blackout drunk w his friends in high school. He and Kav were inseparable. Right now he’s in a safe house, reading comic books. Why didn’t republicans want to hear from him?
-
this is rhetorical, obviously. probably mute the white trash trump bros who ‘respond’
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Damn, even Cernovichy Republican knows Kavanaugh is going down.
-
he knows a lot about rape
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is evidence, but it's possibly the least reliable evidence you can have. Sure. The only thing they can produce is the lowest form of non-corroborative evidence. However, she's presenting it in a credible package. Republicans have a dilemma.
-
Credible package? All of HER witnesses listed deny her claims. One is a personal friend of hers. Lol. Game over. Goodnight.
#ConfirmKavanaughNow -
Look, I’m with ya. I want him to be confirmed. I’m just saying her testimony, to the extent of just her words, made her seem credible. But I still agree that there’s not enough corroborating evidence to support the claim.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you're getting a little technical here. I they mean no corroborating evidence. Yes, the fact that she came and repeated her story is evidence. Not everyone has a legal background.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.