Today has generated a lot of questions and confusion. We know it hasn't been easy for everyone. Going forward, we'll be taking a closer look at our own harassment policies, with the aim to update them. Our thoughts and plans:https://yt.be/help/zxSq
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
“For harassment, we look at whether the purpose of the video is to incite harassment, threaten or humiliate an individual” well if that’s the case then the late night hosts & SNL (Who you sell premium ad roll & promote) would be banned as they’ve been dunking on same ppl for yrs
16 replies 20 retweets 472 likes -
Replying to @East_ @TeamYouTube
I’d like a sense of humor for $800 Alex!
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes -
"It's only okay when we do it" "Rules for thee, but none for me"
2 replies 0 retweets 58 likes -
Replying to @Ceeeeples @WowmanOfWonder and
There’s a difference between satire and insulting/demeaning. Also a difference between criticizing people in power and normal people.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @pcrafton4 @Ceeeeples and
Like calling someone a cock holster, not insulting or demeaning at all!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SmakedTalk @Ceeeeples and
Inappropriate, yes, but still different than insulting someone for their sexuality
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I agree. Offensive statement, but not necessarily derogatory to the extent of prejudice. Women get called cock-holsters, and you don't see them having Twitter meltdowns and convincing brain-dead acolytes like you that they're the literal mindset equivalent of Kim-Jong Un.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.