Cate Owen

Funny how you've sparked a debate among some commenters about whether the article is accurate or not, when obviously your point is about news headlines and science reporting.

Thank you. This screenshot is from one of their syndication partners, the NZ Herald.

Thats because it's not a physical difference it's a chemestry difference. Men and women on average have different thought patterns and that is well documented. It's like two of the exact same computers running two different operating systems.

So the Men vs Women depates are actually Microsoft vs Apple

Women being Apple, obvs

why would you compair women to a company that lies and over charges and blames its users for factory defects.

It was a joke but you're right. And the new MacBook is a piece of shit anyway. I take it back.

It’s surprising that there’s no discernible difference. ??!

I bet there is. I bet you $20 the article OR study's flawed. Most of the articles misinterpret the study. IF they link to the study & you find that the article isn't SO wrong, finding the study's executed poorly's pretty common. They'll BOTH be solid like idk 10%-20% of the time.

This is neither a study nor literature review. It's an expert's opinion given in an interview. I think the point here was that the headline doesn't reflect the content?

Yeah I get the point but so wait this doesn't even cite sources or evidence? It's just a doctor says what they think without backing it up at all? EVEN BETTER

Citations are not sensational enough for the Daily Mail!

UGH. Even worse than articles titled, for example, "Stranger Things Season 3 Release Date," and then the body of the article is "there is currently no release date for Stranger Things season 3."