The leadership and values in this comment by @aaron_turon is a huge reason why I love #rustlang:https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/revisiting-rusts-modules/5628/136?u=carols10cents …
Yeah I'm imagining "50% of v casually-involved people say no = veto" which doesn't seem great either, but that may not be what you mean
-
-
My point is as-written, Rust's consensus model grants a participant in process no defined say. Subteam-lead has final call.
-
That's not all that's promised-- we claim to try to explore and consider all tradeoffs raised by anyone
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There should be way for people who agree without being active participants to weigh in quickly also.
@aaron_turon made that point on RFE. -
There are lots of things I care about but don't respond because others have already made my points.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In practice the core team wouldn't do something that had huge backlash from a majority of users. That's part of what happened here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.