(not that that person's code is suspect, it look pretty good on passing glance, it's just weird to have that not under my control imho)
-
-
Introducing an ecosystem-fragmenting system just to make owners (which *are* shown on crates.io) slightly more prominent seems suboptimal?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
right. and it doesn't handle changes of owernship and downplays the prominence of co-owners
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That said we should probably make it so you can't just add random people as owners without their permission
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
wait you're saying I can add anyone I want as a co-owner? wat omg please never let all the GH randos who @ me nonstop figure this out
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
At least this doesn't work any more https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/issues/176 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
*le faint*
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
crates.io has basically zero security/privacy/whatever engineering work, it's largely been barely maintained
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gankra_ @isislovecruft and
WHO ARE YOU CALLING BASICALLY ZERO https://users.rust-lang.org/t/security-advisory-for-crates-io-2016-08-15/6907 …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Carols10cents @isislovecruft and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.