Rust folx: Would you like it if `extern crate` were optional when using cargo?
-
-
Replying to @withoutboats
most importantly, do you think the language would be easier to learn?
10 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @withoutboats
I think the answer to this is clearly 'yes', but I would argue over it being most important
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nick_r_cameron @withoutboats
this is exactly my thought; it's a trivial speed bump in the language that makes the system better overall.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gankra_ @nick_r_cameron
the reason its not trivial is that it adds syntax to be confused over; extern crate foo when you wanted mod foo
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @withoutboats
overhaul the whole crates/modules/Cargo system.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @nick_r_cameron @withoutboats
argh we JUST finished that chapter in the boook waaaaahh
4:19 PM - 28 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.