If true, that would tend to make it more of a campaign finance violation. It will be interesting to know if the motivation for the payment is expressly discussed on the tape.
-
-
-
so, you mean, IF we had a functioning FEC, it would've been quite a big deal?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Interestingly, Giuliani claims Trump/Cohen were talking about paying McDougal.
https://twitter.com/EricColumbus/status/1020362414662078466 …
-
Well, if Giuliani says so.
-
Yep. We all know he's been sooo truthful so far.
-
What, you don’t trust the lawyer with an office in Kazakhstan?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Campaign finance violations
-
Don't forget bank fraud!
-
And obstruction. / Collusion conspiracy. Treason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And the white evangelicals will still worship and glorify Trump’s holy name..
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
tbf, it is difficult to keep track of all the hush money payments
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wouldn't that be a direct violation of campaign fiance law?
-
Yep. John Edwards nearly went to prison for this
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So they're discussing paying the National Inquirer to cover up the story rather than paying Karen McDougal to be quiet? That makes it worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OH MY well that's 100 times worse for Trump! WOMPS AND PRAYERShttps://twitter.com/CarolLeonnig/status/1020363780616802306 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is worse?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.