cont... and just like freedom of speech in real life you can't call or cause harm with your statements I.e yelling fire in a crowded movie theater or calling for the active assault of people who don't agree with you, like @gaywonk
-
-
Replying to @12lolproduction @Jonathon_Hills and
let me just cut to the chase..."Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech" this is part of the actual first amendment...(1)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @12lolproduction and
...the only thing this does is guarantee that *the government*...won't make any law that stops freedom of speech...no mention of businesses or websites or anything else...it only concerns the protection against future laws being made.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @12lolproduction and
...if...this amendment said something like "the public shall forever have the freedom of speech in whatever manner they choose" it would be a very different USA; but this seems to be the interpretation many Americans have. you can clearly see the difference.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @Jonathon_Hills and
Youtube "Broadcast Yourself" these two words make your entire argument redundant, also for a non American to argue American politics is incredibly ignorant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @12lolproduction @Jonathon_Hills and
My friend, I would love to see how far your argument went in court. I've never once argued American politics. I'm talking about a point of law and how it applies in real world situations. I'm afraid the ignorance ball is firmly in your court.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @Jonathon_Hills and
Yeah American law, ironically your just gonna ignore the part about Broadcast Yourself cause you know your wrong at this point
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @12lolproduction @Jonathon_Hills and
(2) the US court doc that you've copied the point about inciting harm to others etc...shows that there are limitations. I've said all along that companies like YouTube (whether we like it or not) are free to impose whatever limitations they like...thats just the way it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @12lolproduction and
OK, ok..pop quiz...if I'm an artiste and my "craft" involves me livestreaming crapping into a glass then using my fingers to "paint" onto a canvas; occasionally licking my fingers clean...this is the way I express myself, should that be OK on YouTube?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @Jonathon_Hills and
The term Broadcast Yourself is basically like free speech in the sense where you can't be publicly call for violence (Like what
@gaywonk did), youtube has also implemented no nudity so I'm sorry you can't shit in jars. Why do you keep arguing about this you're clearly wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
dude...you realise youre saying what im saying right??
I've said from the beginning corporations can impose whatever restrictions they like on what people say and how they say it regardless of what people think is a right to free speech because they arent the government.
-
-
Replying to @CarltonStClaire @12lolproduction and
I don't agree with it...but as I've said a bunch of times it's how the world works currently.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.