Agreed. What had been the source of discussion is the restriction of a judges ability to remand a suspect. Someone that robs a bank, gets arrested and then robs another bank, shouldn’t be out on the street.
-
-
-
The bank robber was on federal parole, which means the system had the ability to deal with him differently than just releasing him. Many of you are missing that if the system fails to address a situation like this it’s not the laws fault. Please read the law.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
NOBODY should EVER be jailed because they can't afford bail But why 1) Strip Judges discretion 2) 15 day discovery 3) Ban DANGER TO SOCIETY as reason for bail 4) Let a RAPIST revisit the crime scene 5) THROW Victims under the bus 6) HIDE it in the budget, in lieu of a REAL vote
-
1) judges still have discretion to set pre-trial observation 2) DAs often withheld discovery up until the eve of the trial. A DA can ask a judge for an extension(discretion) if the DA feels there is sensitive info 3) Any defendant has the right to view a crime scene.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Now do someone who punches 3 Jewish women & isn't considered violent so gets released with an appearance ticket. Or the guy who attacked a woman's car with an axe. Also released. Or the creeper who broke into a teenage girls bedroom while she was asleep? Also released.
#NYExodus -
The person who punched the three Jewish women is getting mental health services that is clearly needed. Under the old system she would just rot in jail. There is more pre-trial services and intervention that before.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Mr. Heastie, it is irresponsible you’re still standing behind this failed policy. Exhibit 1,000 is serial bank robber Gerod Woodberry, whom the Feds had to get involved to put him away bc he kept getting released under your baby, bail reform.
-
He was on parole which they could have remanded him based on his violation. Please know all the facts.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Your mistake Carl, is thinking that your version of extreme bail reform is not in need of changes. The dishonesty of legislators when selling this bill is disgraceful. Most who oppose your law, and you took the coward's way by going through the budget, are supporters of bail...
-
reform. However, judicial discretion is (don't give me the bs about pretrial obs) necessary as is funding for courts to successfully carry out BR, as they did in the NJ law that your members bring up when talking about its success but never mention the parts you left out.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.