I know everyone is angry and hurt right now in the wake of the Toronto Attack, but there are important reasons why the definition of terrorism is written as such. But politically we can acknowledge Minassian's actions as an act of terror. My Op-Ed:https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-it-invoked-terror-but-we-cant-call-the-toronto-van-attack-terrorism/ …
I think that idea is somewhat more politically developed within the MRA/Incel "community."
-
-
You'd have to make that argument in court. And it would serve no practical good because this guy is facing 10 accounts of first degree murder.
-
It seemed practical enough in this case:https://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/10/01/news/suspect-facing-terrorism-charges-edmonton-truck-attack-investigated-2015 …
-
No terrorism charge in that case. I wrote that in the article you both did not read. Can we stop now please?
-
Mea culpa.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.