CLC's Paul Smith on #FaithlessElectors: "Today’s ruling is the correct one. If electors had been turned loose to ignore their state’s voters, they would have been free to accept contributions from wealthy special interests, free from any public disclosure."https://campaignlegal.org/press-releases/states-can-require-presidential-electors-follow-popular-vote-us-supreme-court-rules …
-
Show this thread
The absence of transparency laws for presidential electors, combined with unfettered discretion, would have led to corruption threatening the very legitimacy of the presidential election.pic.twitter.com/nKTfx79BSQ
0 replies
1 retweet
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.