A ruling to “unbind” presidential electors from their home-state voters would introduce new opportunities for wealthy special interests to influence our politics & for electors to cast their votes in favor of the highest bidder, & not in favor of what voters actually voted for.pic.twitter.com/g82Np22LHK
-
-
Show this thread
-
Our elections should be fair, transparent & protected from corruption. The Supreme Court should make clear that it is constitutional to require presidential electors to vote for the presidential candidate who won the popular vote in their state.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/faithless-electors/607831/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If electors can’t exercise some discretion, why have electors?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.