@owenboswarva see also tiresome http://ow.ly/tN7s6
@owenboswarva @willperrin They can't include time spent considering whether any exemptions apply or redaction time in cost estimate.
-
-
@CampaignFoI@willperrin or are you arguing the response is wrong, i.e. determining which e-mails are personal is part of redaction time? -
@owenboswarva@willperrin Response is wrong. Considering whether s40 applies to addresses can't count towards cost limit. Nor can redacting. -
@CampaignFoI thanks!@willperrin, it sounds as if you have a solid basis for seeking an internal review. -
@CampaignFoI@willperrin though looks as if you requested an internal review earlier in correspondence. Confusing. http://bit.ly/1e86Ref -
@owenboswarva@CampaignFoI that's fab thanks very much - will also try talking to them on the phone to see what the problem is
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@CampaignFoI@willperrin mainly about building#opendata and transparency into organisational culture, not just#FOI processing, though.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CampaignFoI@willperrin but in this example could have captured personal/non-personal distinction at input stage and simplified extraction.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.