@CampaignFoI but info would cost £230 from @LandRegistry - do you think this probitive?
-
-
Replying to @MartinBagot
@MartinBagot Of course@campaignfoi can advise, but this'll almost certainly engage reg 6(1)(b) of EIR, not FOI Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/3391/regulation/6/made …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bainesy1969
@bainesy1969@MartinBagot Jon, *if*#EIR, wouldn't r8(2)(a) or (b) apply to info at Land Registry? LR charge even to inspect. Permissible?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CampaignFoI
@CampaignFoI@martinbagot Hadn't realised they charged 2 inspect. Can't see how this not contravention of Aarhus A5(2)(c) & Directive A5(1)?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bainesy1969
@bainesy1969@CampaignFoI@MartinBagot decision notices suggest ICO don't see as EIR. See http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2012/fer_0454056.ashx … . Course, not conclusive!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FoIManUK
@FoIManUK@bainesy1969@campaignfoi@martinbagot I know this is a detour (apols Martin) but this is surely EIR and@iconews is wrong?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tim2040
@tim2040@foimanuk@campaignfoi Yep. Just noted that, and that case has an FER number! And it's GOT to be EI?!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bainesy1969
@bainesy1969@tim2040@FoIManUK In this case, info relates to land (some green belt) transferred to academies under long term leases.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@CampaignFoI @bainesy1969 @tim2040 @FoIManUK So, will suggest @martinbagot requests info direct from Land Registry under #EIR free of charge
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.