@CampaignFoI but info would cost £230 from @LandRegistry - do you think this probitive?
@bainesy1969 @MartinBagot Jon, *if* #EIR, wouldn't r8(2)(a) or (b) apply to info at Land Registry? LR charge even to inspect. Permissible?
-
-
@CampaignFoI@martinbagot Hadn't realised they charged 2 inspect. Can't see how this not contravention of Aarhus A5(2)(c) & Directive A5(1)? -
@bainesy1969@CampaignFoI@MartinBagot decision notices suggest ICO don't see as EIR. See http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2012/fer_0454056.ashx … . Course, not conclusive! -
@FoIManUK@bainesy1969@campaignfoi@martinbagot I know this is a detour (apols Martin) but this is surely EIR and@iconews is wrong? -
@tim2040@foimanuk@campaignfoi Yep. Just noted that, and that case has an FER number! And it's GOT to be EI?! -
@bainesy1969@tim2040@FoIManUK In this case, info relates to land (some green belt) transferred to academies under long term leases. -
@CampaignFoI@bainesy1969@tim2040@FoIManUK So, will suggest@martinbagot requests info direct from Land Registry under#EIR free of charge
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@CampaignFoI ICO seems to treat this as non-EI, even, bizarrely, when he gives a case an FER number! http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2012/fer_0454056.ashx …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.