One somewhat small, technical point in this broadband debate - when the superfast programmes were launched across the UK superfast meant 24M. Since then it's been reclassified as 30M. Does that help anything? Probably not, but it's a lot of characters so I'll still hit tweet lol
To your point though, I argued at Westminster that fibre schemes should focus on rural as going from 1M to 30M would be transformational, where as taking an urban user from 24Mto even 1G would have little effect for almost all users today.