All people have different tastes in comedy, but would you be willing to get 3.8+ million angry people plus a possible class law suit on your hands and ban Crowder? Put yourself in each person's (Carlos, Crowder, and Youtube) position and weigh it in your head
-
-
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
If those 3.8M people find clearly abusive, homophobic, bullying behavior comedic, then yes I want to piss them all off. And yes I want to ban him off a site that lists 'hurtful, personal comments' as justification for removal. He's welcome to make his own shitty social media site
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
I think I see where the confusion is coming from, this whole bit about 'hurtful, personal comments' comes off of the YouTube Creator blog, and it states this is only justification for at most a video removal and/or a channel strike (which Crowder received). So, punishment served?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted lvl 45 CHAOS GHOSTUS
As far as I'm aware, the videos aren't being removed, and I believe they could even be re-monetized again if Crowder removes the advertisements for the "Socialism is for f*gs" shirtshttps://twitter.com/thetomzone/status/1136136577372119042 …
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
lvl 45 CHAOS GHOSTUSVerified account @thetomzoneYouTube told me that it won't remove videos of Steven Crowder taunting@gaywonk with racist, anti-gay harassment because Crowder was "focused primarily on debating". that's right. debating https://gizmodo.com/youtube-no-we-wont-remove-these-videos-of-racist-ant-1835259054 …Show this thread2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Actually, I have a question for you; Do you think Carlos Maza is in the right to do all this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted Carlos Maza
Given I agree that Crowder deserves to be deplatformed, yes. I honestly don't know how anyone doesn't side with Maza after reading his threadhttps://twitter.com/gaywonk/status/1134263774591037441 …
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Have you wondered *why* more people don't agree with you after reading that thread? It can't just be because they're ignorant or stupid, try going into a little more (if you have the time of course) and weigh it out in your mind
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
As far as I can tell, they've all latched onto the conspiracy theory that they're being deplatformed for merely having a different view point, and not that they make a deliberate effort to throw slurs and harass individuals who have lisps or effeminate personalities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
You can see where that theory comes from though, 2% of their videos were on Vox's Strikethrough and 2% of those videos was about Carlos Maza. Out of over 400 hours of footage since then, only 90 seconds of meant-to-be-offensive jokes were extrapolated and yet now they're demoni.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I honestly do not think it would be difficult at all to find a non-Vox video of his where there's similar behavior exhibited. Plus as I stated at the very beginning, doesn't matter if its 400 hours or 4 Million, he still engages in it (to this day) and deserves consequences.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Do you think an ex-con also should get punished even after being punished? I'm just saying this because the punishment has already been delivered to Crowder
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.