I am going to be frank, that is terrible logic. That's like saying guilty until proven so, instead of innocent until proven guilty. Also, that was a great video you sent me thank you lol
-
-
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I think the more apt analogy would be letting a guilty person who was convinced "beyond a reasonable doubt" walk free because "something in the future could possibly make that doubt more reasonable who knows *shrugs*"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Again, it's only reasonable beyond doubt because you make it out to be. Language and words change over time, which is why we have no hate speech laws and why YouTube persists to have vague rules on language. You used to be stoned to death for saying Jahoba, now do we condemn that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I mean yeah, we go by the laws we have today, cause that's literally all we have. For all we know, his discourse/language could become even *more* offensive in the future, meaning we should actually punish even more now. It's just pointless to speculate on some distant future.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
You're right, it is pointless. which is why we don't use speech that doesn't incite violence (since it's very hard to change a direct call to action in a language over time) in law. If he got more offensive or less offensive as time went by it shouldn't matter
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I don't think anyone's calling for him to be thrown in jail, but he's a personality with millions of impressionable followers, and engages in repeatable, toxic, bullying behavior, lazer-focused at specific individuals. There *needs* to be better checks/consequences for this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
Have you watched any other of Crowder's videos?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I've tried in the past, but I personally cannot tolerate his smug, condescending behavior, especially when it's in regards to topics that he either doesn't understand or willfully misrepresents.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
I understand, everyone has a different taste in people. However, I don't think we would be able to agree unless that were to happen lol
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
You can discuss politics and public discourse without being a massive prick (Ex. Hbomb). I largely engage in tit-for-tat behavior when it comes to how others approach me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If you can, watch some of Crowder's older Change my Mind bits and you'll probably get around the same content of just chilled down and discussing points. I can understand if you're starting to get annoyed with me recommending to watch him lol
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.