Lol that was stupid that he blocked you but that analogy you made was also terrible, are you saying that name calling should be treated the same as first degree murder?
-
-
I'm trying to illustrate the fact that even though Crowder didn't engage in pointless, demeaning, homophobic slurs for the vast majority of his Youtube career, that doesn't at all excuse the numerous instances when he does use them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah I know, I meant it to be rhetoric lol But besides that, what do you consider a homophobic slur? The only actual, what I would consider a slur, is a lispy queer but even that is a fact. He has a lisp and is a queer, other than that everything Crowder said Carlos said himself
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted Carlos Maza
"Gay sprite", "angry little queer", insinuating that his love for chips is equivalent to his supposed appetite for penises, the list goes on. Just cause he self identifies does not give bullies a free pass to use the same terms in clearly hurtful rhetoric.https://twitter.com/gaywonk/status/1136057689585410050 …
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That is true; you're right, he shouldn't have said those things, however are you aware of the differences between a web platform and a web publisher?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣
I'm not sure why it's relevant, honestly.
@TeamYouTube themselves said they were hurtful at the very least, which theoretically violates their own terms of service, which is the crux of the whole issue.https://twitter.com/The_CO_Atheist/status/1136741293382672396 …𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 @The_CO_AtheistReplying to @NoLogiclFallacy @mtraceyExcept their harassment policy literally states hurtful personal comments will be removed, and@TeamYoutube literally stated the comments were hurtful, (https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136055351885815808 …) pic.twitter.com/8FtkvaRpwG2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
They *have* to act as a public square and give everyone equal treatment unless they want to be considered a publisher, in which they would have to be liable for all content uploaded, and since this is pushing the boundary so far
@gaywonk may have just broke the whole platform1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
I mean, it kinda deserves to be shattered/amended if it's going to tolerate this clearly toxic behavior that accomplishes nothing at best and at worst encourages a near endless mob of harassment towards the identified target.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
But the problem is tens of thousands of people make their livelihood off of YouTube, would you be willing to just kick them to the streets because some dude couldn't handle be criticized in a derogatory way?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallowaySutton @gaywonk and
You can criticize an argument without resorting to calling someone a lispy queer, gay sprite, etc. If it was up to me, I'd kick them all out if they really can't stop themselves from engaging in it. I just don't care, it's unacceptable behavior.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
He could've behaved a lot better too, although banning him altright would be angering 3.8+ million people. They should've just demonetized the video for not following the creator guidelines and left it at that
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.